1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda R-100 | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | R-100 | Leaf |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2700 mm |