1968 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 1996 Honda Integra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1968 Mercedes-Benz 220. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1968 Mercedes-Benz 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercedes-Benz 220 weights approximately 136 kg more than 1996 Honda Integra.
Because 1968 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 1996 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Honda |
| Model | 220 | Integra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4525 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1325 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |
