1968 Mercedes-Benz 230 vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz 230. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz 230 would be higher. At 2,308 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Mercedes-Benz 230 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1968 Mercedes-Benz 230. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mercedes-Benz 230. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercedes-Benz 230 weights approximately 333 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mercedes-Benz 230. (179 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mercedes-Benz 230.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mercedes-Benz 230 | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | 230 | 200 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2308 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5340 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |