1968 Mercedes-Benz 300 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 585 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1968 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mercedes-Benz 300 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
Model | 300 | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |