1968 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1968 Mercedes-Benz E. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1968 Mercedes-Benz E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mercedes-Benz E. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mercedes-Benz E.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mercedes-Benz E | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | E | UTE |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |