1968 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2004 Nissan Xterra
To start off, 2004 Nissan Xterra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Xterra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Xterra (180 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Xterra should accelerate faster than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Xterra weights approximately 404 kg more than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan Xterra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Xterra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Xterra (274 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL. (216 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Xterra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mercedes-Benz SL | 2004 Nissan Xterra | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | SL | Xterra |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 3278 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 274 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.8 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 73 L |