1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (179 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | W 111 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |
