1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 weights approximately 315 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. (179 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
Model | W 111 | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 48 L |