1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2012 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (179 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
Model | W 111 | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |