1968 Mercury Cougar vs. 1995 Toyota Corolla

To start off, 1995 Toyota Corolla is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercury Cougar (137 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1995 Toyota Corolla. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1995 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 308 kg more than 1995 Toyota Corolla. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Mercury Cougar 1995 Toyota Corolla
Make Mercury Toyota
Model Cougar Corolla
Year Released 1968 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 1587 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 137 HP 105 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1092 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4100 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2470 mm