1968 Mercury Cougar vs. 1999 Honda Capa
To start off, 1999 Honda Capa is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercury Cougar (137 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1999 Honda Capa. (97 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda Capa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 320 kg more than 1999 Honda Capa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda Capa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mercury Cougar | 1999 Honda Capa | |
Make | Mercury | Honda |
Model | Cougar | Capa |
Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2370 mm |