1968 Mercury Cougar vs. 2011 Ford F-450
To start off, 2011 Ford F-450 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-450 (399 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1968 Mercury Cougar. (194 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2011 Ford F-450 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-450 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-450 (1,085 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 788 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mercury Cougar. (297 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mercury Cougar | 2011 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Cougar | F-450 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5769 cc | 6700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 399 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Torque | 297 Nm | 1085 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 6680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2438 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 2024 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 4379 mm |