1968 Mercury Marauder vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercury Marauder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercury Marauder would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Marauder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1968 Mercury Marauder. (205 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1968 Mercury Marauder.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mercury Marauder (453 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1968 Mercury Marauder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mercury Marauder | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mercury | Holden |
| Model | Marauder | UTE |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7003 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 453 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
