1968 Mercury Montclair vs. 2004 Volvo S60

To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercury Montclair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercury Montclair would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Montclair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercury Montclair (267 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2004 Volvo S60. (247 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercury Montclair should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercury Montclair weights approximately 432 kg more than 2004 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Mercury Montclair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mercury Montclair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mercury Montclair (546 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo S60. (330 Nm). This means 1968 Mercury Montclair will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo S60.

Compare all specifications: