1968 Mercury Montclair vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercury Montclair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercury Montclair would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Montclair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercury Montclair (267 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercury Montclair should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1968 Mercury Montclair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mercury Montclair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mercury Montclair | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Montclair | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6393 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2490 mm |