1968 MG 1100 vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2000 Smart Roadster is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 MG 1100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart Roadster (101 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1968 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1968 MG 1100.
Because 2000 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Smart Roadster (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 MG 1100 | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
| Make | MG | Smart |
| Model | 1100 | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2370 mm |
