1968 MG 1100 vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,832 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (129 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1968 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1968 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Celica weights approximately 315 kg more than 1968 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Celica (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1968 MG 1100 | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | 1100 | Celica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1832 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2800 mm |