1968 MG 1100 vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1968 MG 1100. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 MG 1100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1968 MG 1100 | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | MG | Holden |
Model | 1100 | Epica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 83 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |