1968 MG 1100 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1968 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1968 MG 1100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 MG 1100 | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | MG | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1100 | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2852 mm |
