1968 MG MGC vs. 1995 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1995 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1995 Volkswagen Polo. (73 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 1995 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1968 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Volkswagen Polo. (129 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1968 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1968 MG MGC | 1995 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | MG | Volkswagen |
Model | MGC | Polo |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2911 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 129 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2410 mm |