1968 MG MGC vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG MGC would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1968 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1968 MG MGC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1968 MG MGC | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | MG | Chevrolet |
Model | MGC | Camaro |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2911 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2852 mm |