1968 MG MGC vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1968 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1968 MG MGC.
Because 1968 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1968 MG MGC | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | MG | Chevrolet |
Model | MGC | HHR |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2911 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4483 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1588 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2629 mm |