1968 MG MGC vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG MGC would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1968 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1968 MG MGC.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1968 MG MGC | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | MG | Jeep |
Model | MGC | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2911 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2423 mm |