1968 Mini MK II vs. 1976 Seat 133
To start off, 1976 Seat 133 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mini MK II would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mini MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 34 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Seat 133 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1968 Mini MK II.
Because 1976 Seat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Seat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mini MK II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mini MK II (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1968 Mini MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mini MK II | 1976 Seat 133 | |
Make | Mini | Seat |
Model | MK II | 133 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 54 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |