1968 Mini MK II vs. 2004 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2004 Westfield ZEI is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mini MK II would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Westfield ZEI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield ZEI (174 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1968 Mini MK II. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 1968 Mini MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Westfield ZEI weights approximately 60 kg more than 1968 Mini MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Westfield ZEI is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield ZEI. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mini MK II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mini MK II | 2004 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | Mini | Westfield |
Model | MK II | ZEI |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2340 mm |