1968 Mini MK II vs. 2006 Panoz Esperante
To start off, 2006 Panoz Esperante is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mini MK II would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Panoz Esperante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Panoz Esperante (305 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1968 Mini MK II. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Panoz Esperante should accelerate faster than 1968 Mini MK II.
Because 2006 Panoz Esperante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Panoz Esperante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mini MK II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Panoz Esperante (434 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mini MK II. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Panoz Esperante will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mini MK II.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mini MK II | 2006 Panoz Esperante | |
Make | Mini | Panoz |
Model | MK II | Esperante |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 434 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |