1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Singer Vogue III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Singer Vogue III (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Singer Vogue III should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Singer Vogue III weights approximately 182 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Singer Vogue III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Singer Vogue III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Singer |
Model | Colt | Vogue III |
Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1592 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2570 mm |