1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1971 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1971 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 1971 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | NSU |
Model | Colt | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1990 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2870 mm |