1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1973 Seat 127
To start off, 1973 Seat 127 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1973 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1973 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 205 kg more than 1973 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Seat 127. (64 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 1973 Seat 127 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
Model | Colt | 127 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 903 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 64 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2230 mm |