1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 410 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Colt | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2260 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2680 mm |
