1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1998 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1998 Toyota Camry is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota Camry (135 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota Camry weights approximately 505 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Toyota Camry (196 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 1998 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Colt | Camry |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2164 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 196 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1415 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1810 mm |
