1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Murano weights approximately 826 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Murano (334 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Colt | Murano |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3507 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 334 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1736 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2830 mm |