1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2005 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Baleno (85 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 20 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Baleno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Baleno. (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1968 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 2005 Suzuki Baleno | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Suzuki |
| Model | Colt | Baleno |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1298 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 890 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2390 mm |
