1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Pontiac Torrent
To start off, 2006 Pontiac Torrent is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Pontiac Torrent is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Pontiac Torrent (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Pontiac Torrent should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Pontiac Torrent weights approximately 437 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Pontiac Torrent (286 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Pontiac Torrent will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Pontiac Torrent | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
Model | Colt | Torrent |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3425 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 286 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1347 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2860 mm |