1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. (50 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 59 kg more than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1968 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Daewoo |
Model | Colt | Matiz |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 794 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 851 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2350 mm |