1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 465 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford C-Max (240 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Colt | C-Max |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1596 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2648 mm |