1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2011 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Jaguar |
| Model | Colt | XF |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2908 mm |
