1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2013 Audi A3
To start off, 2013 Audi A3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A3 (138 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A3 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Audi A3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 2013 Audi A3 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
Model | Colt | A3 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1984 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4292 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1995 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1423 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2578 mm |