1968 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2013 Volvo S80
To start off, 2013 Volvo S80 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S80 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S80 weights approximately 790 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S80 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | 2013 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Colt | S80 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3200 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4851 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1861 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1493 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2835 mm |
