1968 Morris Mini Moke vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1968 Morris Mini Moke is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 847 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Morris Mini Moke is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Morris Mini Moke weights approximately 75 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Morris Mini Moke, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Morris Mini Moke (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Morris Mini Moke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Morris Mini Moke | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Morris | Seat |
| Model | Mini Moke | 600 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 847 cc | 767 cc |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3050 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2010 mm |
