1968 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1967 Opel Record
To start off, 1968 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Opel Record. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Opel Record would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Opel Record is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Opel Record (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Opel Record should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Opel Record (152 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. (103 Nm). This means 1967 Opel Record will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Bluebird | 1967 Opel Record | |
| Make | Nissan | Opel |
| Model | Bluebird | Record |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 2511 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2670 mm |
