1968 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1968 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Bluebird. (103 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Bluebird | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Bluebird | C70 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1840 mm |
