1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 1982 Volvo 265
To start off, 1982 Volvo 265 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,848 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 265 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 265 weights approximately 94 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 265 (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 1982 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Cedric | 265 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 2848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
