1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 1995 Oldsmobile Bravada
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Bravada is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Bravada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Oldsmobile Bravada (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Bravada should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Bravada weights approximately 464 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Oldsmobile Bravada (312 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1995 Oldsmobile Bravada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 1995 Oldsmobile Bravada | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cedric | Bravada |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2720 mm |
