1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 1997 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 1997 Reliant Scimitar is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1997 Reliant Scimitar. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1997 Reliant Scimitar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 397 kg more than 1997 Reliant Scimitar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Reliant Scimitar. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Reliant Scimitar.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Nissan Cedric | 1997 Reliant Scimitar | |
Make | Nissan | Reliant |
Model | Cedric | Scimitar |
Year Released | 1968 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 893 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2140 mm |