1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2002 Kia Sephia II
To start off, 2002 Kia Sephia II is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Kia Sephia II. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Sephia II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 271 kg more than 2002 Kia Sephia II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Sephia II. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Sephia II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2002 Kia Sephia II | |
| Make | Nissan | Kia |
| Model | Cedric | Sephia II |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2570 mm |
