1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2003 Toyota Yaris
To start off, 2003 Toyota Yaris is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Yaris. (64 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Yaris. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 460 kg more than 2003 Toyota Yaris. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Yaris. (93 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Yaris.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2003 Toyota Yaris | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Cedric | Yaris |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
