1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2004 Proton 400
To start off, 2004 Proton 400 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 300 kg more than 2004 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton 400. (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2004 Proton 400 | |
| Make | Nissan | Proton |
| Model | Cedric | 400 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 109 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |
