1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2004 Scion xA
To start off, 2004 Scion xA is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (114 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Scion xA. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2004 Scion xA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 229 kg more than 2004 Scion xA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Scion xA. (142 Nm). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Scion xA.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Nissan Cedric | 2004 Scion xA | |
| Make | Nissan | Scion |
| Model | Cedric | xA |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1061 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |
