1968 Nissan Cedric vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 549 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Nissan Cedric | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 383 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |